ABC New Hampshire Democratic Debate - 1/5/08 - Part 6 of 10

KLNDR Says:

Jan 10, 2008 - Richardson sucks at delivery. He taps the table too often. It's distracting and annoying.

streetswell Says:

Jan 11, 2008 - Very true, but he's absolutely right in his message.

mommeya Says:

Jan 11, 2008 - As a rich woman Hillary only sees with a healthy wallet. Oboma understands people do walk around trying to scrape up for a bus ride so how can they afford health insurance. Oboma is a man who sees all Americans "even the poor".

nievesm69 Says:

Jan 12, 2008 - On this subject i must agree with Hilary Clinton! we must get our troops out! This war, A CIVIL WAR is NOT our war. We CAN NOT play god We CAN NOT place our own soldiers in deaths grasp to fight for something that is not ours to fight for.. Our men joined to serve OUR COUNTRY not anyone elses

slimdaddy68 Says:

Jan 14, 2008 - It's funny how she sounds like a Republican when it comes to the war. If I didn't know better... Also, I disagree with Hillary "stealing" Obama's slogan word CHANGE after being beat by him in Iowa. Hell, even the Republicans stole his slogan word! She keeps talking about experience that she doesn't have. Just 'cause you're "the wife of" doesn't count as an official office! What office was she holding before Senator for NY? HELLO?!?! Pillow talk doesn't count as experience!

baerman303 Says:

Jan 16, 2008 - I don't think she sounds like a republican, I think that she takes a much more cautious approach in withdrawal. She's right: we cannot just abandon those who are helping americans. Even though the war was wrong, it's going to be very difficult to pull out and keep Iraq as a functioning nation. Still Obama and Edwards would make the best President and Vice President nomination.

slimdaddy68 Says:

Jan 16, 2008 - The Iraqi gov't has taken too long to get themselves together. The recent benchmarks that they've met probably have come at the realization that a Democrat will most likely get into the White House. Further, are you aware that the interim gov't took time off because it was "too hot?" It wasn't too hot for our troops out there, lugging around 100lbs of gear while getting shot at and killed? That's just an inexcusable slap in the face to all of us who are paying for this war.

baerman303 Says:

Jan 16, 2008 - Yes, I understand that, and I abhor them for their actions. And, I admire our troops who are sacrificing as much as they are for a war that was baseless and morally reprehensible. That being said, as a nation we cannot just invade and then withdraw without forcing the Iraqi government to improve and create a functioning nation. I am not happy at all with the war in Iraq, but the issue of withdrawal is much more complecated than a lot of people realize.

slimdaddy68 Says:

Jan 16, 2008 - I disagree. This is a civil war that we should not have ever gotten into. However, that's not the reason. The reason that we are here is much more evil and sinister than you are being told. In short, Bush is trying to destroy the US economy and our sovereignty to create the NAU, the Amero and the last piece of the One World gov't scheme that has been in action for more than 60 years or so.

slimdaddy68 Says:

Jan 16, 2008 - The Security Prosperity and Protection Act, riding on NAFTA is part of the scheme as well. The goal is to erase the borders between Canada, the US and Mexico, creating a free trade zone. The North American Union will be patterned after the European Union, the African Union and the South Asian Union.

slimdaddy68 Says:

Jan 16, 2008 - Bush and Cheney are pushing to keep us in this war which is affecting our economy. The recent mortgage debacle I believe is also a part. Hell, he tried to sell the investments to someone during his recent trip abroad. Him and his cronies are trying to destroy this country for world power and domination by the Rothschilds, the Rockerfellers, the Bush family and their friends. They targeted Saddam in Jan. 2001, long before 9/11!

slimdaddy68 Says:

Jan 16, 2008 - 9/11 was engineered to create the excuse to go and create permanent bases and fatten the coffers of the oil barons in the East. Why is it that Bush has refused to create an energy policy involving alternative fuels, unless he benefits from the oil addiction of the US. Check my WTC Conspiracy playlist

baerman303 Says:

Jan 16, 2008 - first of all that is utter nonsense. If you look at all the reliable evidence the idea that this administration took down the twin towers and fired a cruise missle into the pentagon, AND shot down an airplane all to lead us into war.

baerman303 Says:

Jan 16, 2008 - They certainly wanted to war with Iraq, but we did not go into a civil war: we started a civil war after toppling Saddaam, a monster, but someone who kept the sectarian conflict from spilling over. We started a civil war, therefore we did not "get into it". We started it.

baerman303 Says:

Jan 16, 2008 - As to this massive american conspiracy to unify the North American continent under one flag, or in the style of the EU or AU is in my opinion nonsense. But we may just have a disagreement of opinions, where the facts are on my side, and your opinions are on yours.

baerman303 Says:

Jan 17, 2008 - This is a stupid idea. I didn't add that earlier.

simple88869 Says:

Jan 18, 2008 - I believe Hillary Clinton would be the best choice for president. Senator Obama stated that he would enter Pakistan to get Alkeida if he had reason to believe that they were there. Didn't we enter Iraq for similar reasons? We believed the country was harboring terrorist and/or weapons of mass destruction. Senator Obama attacked Hillary for voting for the war. Here he is making the same kind of decision.

simple88869 Says:

Jan 18, 2008 - People tend to forget that Hillary represented New York when 911 happened. She voted the way she did to protect Americans against any other possible threat. Remember how many people wouldn't travel after 911? People were scared of similar attacks would happen. I am sure she was afraid of that possibility too. It is not fair for Obama to come in and say she was wrong. He wasn't representing a state that was just attacked. Had he been in Hillary's position, he may have voted the other way.

waveoflight Says:

Jan 29, 2008 - Mike Gravel is the best choice. This would be clear to you but for the fact that he has been censored by the media. Learn about this candidate Mike Gravel /watch?v=arS8nFguDsU Stop and Think

mirandarichards75 Says:

Feb 5, 2008 - Hillary is amazing and Barack is amazing, period. Either of these leaders would make a huge difference in the quality of life for the people of our own country and for the world. They will only restore the U.S. reputation on the global platform and lead us to glory. Don't be afraid. Now the choice is yours.

herunarivelice Says:

Feb 7, 2008 - It might be true, but that's not what Hillary said. Hillary was adamantly against the Iraq war - that is, when public opinion turned against it. Besides, Iraq had very little to do with 911. Invading Iraq doesn't exactly make New York better.

herunarivelice Says:

Feb 7, 2008 - Obama stated that if it was determined necessary. Going into Iraq wasn't necessary, and it was foolish. That's the difference. Necessity, or just foolhardy.

0n3prince Says:

Feb 20, 2008 - Obama is a great orator. Probably main reason he is so electrifying. I wish he wins cause not only is he not accepting money from large cooporations but I think he is the better candidate. Remember that hillary was fighting for universal health care but soom accepted a "donation" of a large sum from an insurance company in order for her to stop. But it doesn;t actually matter cause who ever wins most diffenetly gonna be better president than the current one.

kns1864 Says:

May 16, 2008 - Is it just me or does Richardson just sound like a whining pussyboy. The rest aren't much better. Just sickening that out of a population of 300 million people these bags of shit are what we have to choose from. This country is fucked.

kns1864 Says:

May 16, 2008 - Likeability? What kind of topic is that? Who cares! What about their thoughts on what is fucked up in this country like......OVERTAXATION! Was their anything worth hearing in this debate?